News

“It is not contrary to reason,” wrote David Hume, the 18th century Scottish philosopher, “for me to chuse my total ruin, to prevent the least uneasiness of an Indian or person wholly unknown to me.” The US, the UK, the EU and Nato have all said they will not directly intervene militarily to prevent the “uneasiness” of even some hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (“Investigators start to gather evidence of possible atrocities against civilians”, Report, April 5).

But is there a threshold number for those suffering horrendous deaths — 5mn, 10mn or 20mn — which, if reached, leads the west to intervene, be it through reason, compassion or perceived self-interest?

And if that happens, what have we to say to those who were allowed to suffer and die before that threshold was reached?

Peter Cave
London W1, UK

Articles You May Like

Biden says he is ‘passing the torch’ to save US democracy
Reeves hints at imminent above-inflation pay deals for teachers and nurses
Warren Buffett’s Berkshire trims Bank of America stake for the first time since 2019 after strong rally
NextEra considers restarting Iowa nuclear plant amid rising demand for carbon-free energy
June home sales slump, pointing to a buyer’s market as supply increases