News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Vanguard announces fee cuts for nearly 100 funds, including ETFs with billions of dollars in assets
Two Moody’s analysts among lives lost in American Airlines crash
Modern trains among MARTA’s plans for green bond sale
MSRB to launch ‘holistic review’ of muni advisor rules
Top Wall Street analysts are optimistic about the growth prospects of these 3 stocks