News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Inside a $60 million beachfront mansion with subterranean secrets and Italian flair
Democratic donors warn of campaign funds ‘drying up’ as Biden holds on
Starmer’s relegation of 31 Labour MPs and peers creates cohort of potential troublemakers
Leftwing surge thwarts far right in French election
Reeves warns UK public finances in worst state since second world war